Comments for ProLog http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog prolquor.net's web log on the future of public opinion polling Thu, 20 May 2010 00:01:51 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 Comment on About by anygirl777 http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?page_id=2&cpage=1#comment-147 anygirl777 Thu, 20 May 2010 00:01:51 +0000 #comment-147 This story had a few good thoughts, but I'm going to retweet it to my brothers and see what they think. I'm always getting stuff in my email from them, so I might as well share some cool things I find. Thanks, Mary Fisher <a href="http://shavingmug.info/" rel="nofollow">Shaving mug</A> This story had a few good thoughts, but I’m going to retweet it to my brothers and see what they think. I’m always getting stuff in my email from them, so I might as well share some cool things I find. Thanks,

Mary Fisher
Shaving mug

]]> Comment on Unringing The Bell by ProLog » Blog Archive » The Hope of Deliberative Polling http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=144&cpage=1#comment-134 ProLog » Blog Archive » The Hope of Deliberative Polling Fri, 29 Jan 2010 04:16:25 +0000 http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=144#comment-134 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> Comment on Open Source Polling Redux by ProLog » Blog Archive » Rasmussen Takes Polling to the People http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=18&cpage=1#comment-17 ProLog » Blog Archive » Rasmussen Takes Polling to the People Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:57:12 +0000 http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=18#comment-17 [...] on questioning and statistical analysis of the results, it would be the first step into true open source polling. Tags: open source, Polling, Rasmussen Category: Review  |  Comment (RSS) [...] [...] on questioning and statistical analysis of the results, it would be the first step into true open source polling. Tags: open source, Polling, Rasmussen Category: Review  |  Comment (RSS) [...]

]]> Comment on Polling 101: Correlation by ProLog » Blog Archive » Unringing The Bell http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=115&cpage=1#comment-13 ProLog » Blog Archive » Unringing The Bell Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:05:36 +0000 http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=115#comment-13 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> Comment on Polling 101: Correlation by ProLog » Blog Archive » A fresh approach: Minekey http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=115&cpage=1#comment-11 ProLog » Blog Archive » A fresh approach: Minekey Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:58:39 +0000 http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=115#comment-11 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> Comment on Polling 101: Correlation by ProLog » Blog Archive » Polling 101: Visualizing Correlation http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=115&cpage=1#comment-10 ProLog » Blog Archive » Polling 101: Visualizing Correlation Sun, 20 Dec 2009 03:21:25 +0000 http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=115#comment-10 [...] Contact Us « Polling 101: Correlation [...] [...] Contact Us « Polling 101: Correlation [...]

]]> Comment on Polling 101: Expected Values by ProLog » Blog Archive » Polling 101: Correlation http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=29&cpage=1#comment-9 ProLog » Blog Archive » Polling 101: Correlation Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:07:31 +0000 http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=29#comment-9 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> Comment on Polling 101: Expected Values by Max http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=29&cpage=1#comment-8 Max Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:04:24 +0000 http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=29#comment-8 One thing I forgot to mention. Just as the covariance has an alternate form to make calculating it easier, so to does the variance. Its: Var(X) = E[(X - \mu_x)^2] = E(X^2) - \mu_x^2 http://mathurl.com/ybfqbwz.png One thing I forgot to mention. Just as the covariance has an alternate form to make calculating it easier, so to does the variance. Its:

Var(X) = E[(X - \mu_x)^2] = E(X^2) – \mu_x^2

http://mathurl.com/ybfqbwz.png

]]> Comment on Polling 101: Dependence by ProLog » Blog Archive » Polling 101: Correlation http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=108&cpage=1#comment-7 ProLog » Blog Archive » Polling 101: Correlation Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:54:33 +0000 http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=108#comment-7 [...] Contact Us « Polling 101: Dependence [...] [...] Contact Us « Polling 101: Dependence [...]

]]> Comment on Polling 101: Probability by ProLog » Blog Archive » Polling 101: Dependence http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=56&cpage=1#comment-6 ProLog » Blog Archive » Polling 101: Dependence Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:50:50 +0000 http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=56#comment-6 [...] on polling theory and statistical analysis, we pick up where we left off from our discussion of probability, and introduce 2 new concepts: conditional probability and [...] [...] on polling theory and statistical analysis, we pick up where we left off from our discussion of probability, and introduce 2 new concepts: conditional probability and [...]

]]>