<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polling 101: Probability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/Index.php?feed=rss2&#038;p=56" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=56</link>
	<description>prolquor.net&#039;s web log on the future of public opinion polling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:01:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ProLog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Polling 101: Dependence</title>
		<link>http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=56&#038;cpage=1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>ProLog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Polling 101: Dependence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proloquor.net/ProLog/?p=56#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] on polling theory and statistical analysis, we pick up where we left off from our discussion of probability, and introduce 2 new concepts: conditional probability and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on polling theory and statistical analysis, we pick up where we left off from our discussion of probability, and introduce 2 new concepts: conditional probability and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
